I'm Done

For the past few years, I've been on a quest to earn my White Scarf, but no more. I've realized that in my quest, I'd become someone I don't particularly like and - even worse - I'd stopped having fun.

I was trying to ingratiate myself with people I didn't particularly like. I was refusing to help people I call friends. And I found myself hating friends for the recognitions they'd earned. In short, trying to become a White Scarf turned me into an asshole.

Don't get me wrong, this is nothing against the White Scarves, this is about me. This is about my personal greed. And the realization that if I'd continued down that path, I'd never truly be a White Scarf, no matter what honors or recognitions I earned.

So I'm done with my quest. It's time to go back to what I loved about fencing in the first place: the fencing. And nurturing our younger fencers. And watching them grow until they exceed their teachers.

I do still hope to someday be offered the White Scarf, but if I'm not, I'm not. I have to be true to myself, and I have to be true to my honor. Anything else is just window dressing.

And since this blog was conceived as a tool to help me achieve my White Scarf, I think it's time to retire it. Perhaps someday I'll revisit it with purer motivation, perhaps not. I just hope that this little experiment has done more good than harm.

So for now, I'll leave you.

In Service to the Dream,

Gebeider Matheus de Petyn, Order of the Gold Scarf
Castelleone Nuovo, Artemisia

Honor War

I want to say thank you to the College of Lyonsmarche for a wonderful event this last weekend. I would also like to thank the fine fencers there for allowing me to use my curved blades in the fighting.

The wonderful thing about out of kingdom events (especially when you're the only one from your kingdom) is that you don't have to worry about anything. You're not a threat. Since you're a foreigner, the other fencers aren't going to spend all of their time sizing you up and trying to tear apart your style so they can defeat you at the next tournament. What they are going to do (especially if you have any sort of scarf or are fighting with some oddball weapon) is try you out. This makes for a wonderful chance for you to fight against brand new, skilled fighters. And I discovered that, in An Tir, a Gold Scarf means you're a former kingdom champion. Which pretty much guaranteed that they were giving me their best fights.

It was wonderful. I spent at least three hours doing pick-ups, working with my short curved against a myriad of skill levels and styles. And I discovered something: my short curved was the equal of any long blade out there. Okay, maybe not the equal. It took some work to get inside their range, but I was able to do it. And I was able to do it in a way that I didn't have to worry about anyone figuring out my moves before the next tourney.

And that was before the tourney or the melees. I switched back to case for the tourney, so I didn't really learn too much, but when it came time for the melees, I switched back to short and dagger and that was a learning experience.

Boy was it. For starters, if you're in a battle that's eight guns to two, you want to be on the side with eight. The other thing was that my short is a lousy primary for open field battles, but it works pretty darn well in keep battles. The last thing I learned was that An Tiran fencers really aren't very good a melees. My guess is that they focus more on the tourney side of things.

All in all, it was a wonderful event. And, with a showing in the tourney of somewhere between 17 wins, 8 losses and 20 wins, 5 losses (with a 26-person round robin, it's kind of hard to keep track), I think I did our kingdom proud.

Well Hell

I got talked into going to Honor War this weekend. It wasn't that hard, really. New people to play with and a chance to blow the cobwebs off my melee skills? Oh, yeah. So I started getting my stuff together and figured I'd better check out the good old blade types list to make sure I was good to go. It's a good thing I did, too.

As you know, I've been working for the past couple of years with curved blades. About the only time I've used any of my straight blades in the last year was in warm-ups, and that was just so my opponents won't figure out my curved swords. Anyway, I'd planned on using my short curved this weekend just so I could work out the bugs with it but, when I looked at the blade types list for An Tir, they're not legal.

Okay, maybe it's not so bad. I know at a lot of the larger wars, out-of-kingdom visitors have to meet the weapon requirements for their own kingdom. So I go and check An Tir's rules. Nope. All visitors are expected to meet An Tir's weapon requirements.

I really wanted to play with my curved, but I figured it was okay. I still had 3 straight swords I could use. And then I read further. An Tir limits quillons to no more than 12 inches. I know my main straight sword meets that requirements, but my 40 for sure is more than 12 inches across and my back-up 36 is a bit on the long side too.

So I've got one sword I can definitely use. I'm still going to bring my curved swords, but I'm not holding much hope for that. At least on the plus-side, the sword I can use, I've been using for 10 years now.

We'll just have to see how the weekend goes.

What will I do?

As part of his ongoing project to prepare me for becoming a White Scarf, my knight has gotten me thinking about what I would require of my cadets if and when I am in a position to take some. After years of thinking about what to look for in a White Scarf, it's forcing me to think about what a White Scarf should look for in a cadet.

Some of the stuff still applies, though. I'd want someone who lives fairly close so I could stay in touch with them. I'd want someone whose sense of honor is compatible with mine. And I'd want someone who I respected, otherwise I'd wouldn't give them the attention they deserved. But beyond that?

I think I'd have to look at their goals. What do they want out of being a cadet, or is that their ultimate goal? I don't think I'd want someone as a cadet whose entire goal is to become a cadet. I'd want someone who is striving for more: someone who wants to be a White Scarf, or even just the best fencer they could possibly be. My goal as far as my students are concerned has always been for them to be the best they can be.

I'd also have to look at their persona. Not in that I'd only take 16th Century Lowlanders or 14th Century Highlanders, but rather that I want to be able to at least have an idea of when or where someone comes from by their garb. And this one isn't really a deal breaker, more a goal that I would set for my students: if they're a 10th Century Norman, I want them to look like a 10th Century Norman, both off and on the field.

And I think I'd also look at their blades. Is their sword what their persona would use? Do they think they're Duncan McLeoud and fight with a Katana, even though their persona is from Edinburough? Again like with the garb, this would be more of a process than a requirement. I'd want them to do the research and put together a blade that was appropriate for their persona, both in style and balance. Notice I said put together: I'd want them to actually start with a bare blade and either build or buy the hardware to give them a truly custom sword.

These are just my initial thoughts so far, and I'd be curious to know what the White Scarves out there are looking for in a prospective cadet.

Any thoughts?

An Interesting Dilemma

One of the rounds in the tournament at Sentinel's Keep this last weekend brought up an interesting dilemma. In the round, each fighter was given a point for each wounding or killing blow they landed on their opponent, with a maximum of three points possible per fighter. After a fighter had earned the three points, they had the option of either continuing with the fight until someone was dead or withdrawing and calling the fight over. And that's where the dilemma comes in: if you've earned your three points and your opponent still has an offensive capability, do you withdraw, or do you go for the kill?

In the tournament in question, if you went for the kill, you couldn't earn any more points and risked the chance of your opponent earning more points by hitting or killing you, but your own points were safe whether you lived or not. And if you withdrew, you denied your opponent from earning any more points while again leaving your points safe. So what to do?

If you were thinking strategically, you'd withdraw and assure the smallest number of points for your opponent. But does that strategy fulfill the requirements of your honor? There's the rub. And like most questions of honor, I cannot answer it for you. All I can do is tell you what my choice was in the tournament: I chose option C. I made sure my third blow was a killing one so that I wasn't faced with the choice.

Sometimes the best way to keep your honor untarnished is to avoid situations that will force you to ask what honor demands of you.

A Challenge

An open letter was posted to the Aerie today about the continuing problem of excessive hits. My first though on it (and not knowing the details of the incident that brought about the letter) was that at least we were doing better up North here. After all, I only came home from Spring Feast with a single interesting bruise, and only a few other people at the event complained of hard hits. Not bad for a two-hour long tournament.

But...

It might not have been bad, but it wasn't as good as it should have been. After all, the ideal is that we can go through an entire tournament (or melee) without a single hard hit, no matter how long the fighting lasts. And I've talked in the past about how to train away the tendency to hit hard, but I think that the problem isn't just one of training: I think it's a problem of positive reinforcement. Even though the rules state that fencers are not required to take excessive hits, in all my twenty years of fencing, I have never seen a fencer do so. So even if you do clock a guy, you're still given the win. Sure, you may get a talking to, and you might have to apologize, but you still win. So for some people, the choice comes down to fighting beyond their skill level and having to say they're sorry or possibly losing. And, as the old saying goes, sometimes it's easier to beg forgiveness than ask permission.

And that's where the challenge comes in: over the next year, if you throw a shot and you think it's too hard - or your worthy opponent thinks it's too hard - take it back. We are fencers. We are supposed to be grace and elegance personified. We should not need to muscle our way through a tournament. We should be able to hit our opponents precisely where we intended with precisely the right force - no more, no less - for the attack to count. Many of us already call back shots that are too light, let's start calling back shots that are too hard.

I accept my own challenge. For the next year, I will call back any and all blows I land that either I or someone else feels is too hard. Will you?

Yes, but...

I've had my Alchem curved Safeflex blade for better than two years now and I have to say I don't have a complaint about it. Well, maybe one: aesthetically, it falls under the 10-foot rule. That is, it looks period when viewed from 10 feet or farther away. Other than that, it's a great sword.

Alchem's Safeflex blades appear to be made from stamped steel (as opposed to forged blades in the more traditional schlagers) with rounded edges and fluting running lengthwise through the strong of the blade. The blades are then pressed and epoxied into the tang assembly.

The weight on it is good. While it is heavier than my other 40" (a Triplette), it is far from unwieldy and its tapered blade allows it to approach the weight and balance of period blades without an excessively heavy pommel. The blade also manages to be reasonably flexible while not being whippy. However, due to the fluting down the strong of the blade, it will not flex as far as a traditional schlager blade.

Due to the wider design of the blade and the fluting of the strong, Alchem does not need to use as hard of a steel for their blades as is found in a traditional schlager. This does lead to an increased tendency for the blade to get nicks, but not prohibitively so. Now don't get me wrong: you will not get the 15+ years of service you see out of the old WKC blades, but they should last at least as well as your average Zen Warrior or Hanwei.

Overall, I am very impressed with the quality of the Safeflex blades - they are a good blade for the budget-minded - but there is one issue that keeps me from recommending Alchem to people sword hunting: their order turnaround time. My first Alchem blade I ordered in September and received in December. My most recent batch of blades (2 bare blades, 1 complete sword) was ordered in early November. It is now March and I am still waiting for them to show up. When I've talked to other fencers who have ordered blades from Alchem, they've told me similar stories. This, combined with the fact that all but their curved sword blades are considered experimental in Artemisia means that I cannot, in good conscious, recommend Alchem Armory to fencers looking for a new sword.

But, if you are looking for a curved sword, your only choices are between Alchem and the more expensive Darkwood Armory. So if you must order from Alchem, do it at the end of tourney season: with a little luck, you'll have your sword before the next one starts.

Killing is for the unimaginative

Another discussion has come up on Artemisia Militaris on the propriety of "sniping." Is it honorable? Is it showboating or a display of skill? Is it robbing your opponent of a good fight? Does a person's tendency to snipe change depending on the level of the tournament or melee? Is it embarrassing for your opponent?

For those who don't know, sniping in SCA fencing is the taking primarily of hands, although sometimes it can refer to feet. The question of whether sniping is honorable or not is, of course, up to each individual to decide, but I see no valid argument for sniping to be inherently dishonorable. To me, sniping is no different than taking an arm or a leg: it is a way to remove a weapon or defense from your opponent. And, if you manage to take both of your opponent's arms, you have defeated them without having to kill them.

Okay, so is sniping showboating or a display of skill? Yes. Just as advanced enough technology is indistinguishable from magic, a truly skilled fencer will come across as showboating. As fencers, we pride ourselves on our gracefulness. We strive for the apparent effortless fluidity that turns a bout into a dance. We strive for that perfect shot. And sniping the hand comes very close to that perfect shot: you're trying to hit a 3"x3" target that's almost completely protected. That'd be the equivalent of an archer hitting a target behind a tree: no small feat.

What about the idea that you're robbing your opponent of a good fight by sniping? Well, I suppose it depends on your opponent's definition of a good fight. Personally, I'd rather be sniped than one-shotted, but then again, I am ambidextrous and enjoy challenging fights.

Does my tendency to snipe change depending on the level of the tournament or melee? Not really. It actually depends more on the level of my opponent: the better they are, the more likely I am to snipe them. And in melees, I don't snipe at all. Sniping is precision work while melees are quick and dirty affairs.

And lastly, is being sniped embarrassing for your opponent or is it an opportunity for learning? I can't speak for others, but I don't find it embarrassing. To me, it is an opportunity for learning, especially when I get into instructor mode. It's one of those bad habits I picked up from my teacher way back when: if your guard slips into neutral, I'll tag you on the outside of your forearm. Guard too high? I'll tag you in the Ulna. Likewise, if I can see your hand, odds are, I can hit it.

The short of it is: if you don't like sniping, don't do it and if you don't want to be sniped, get a better guard. In theory, you only need a 3/4" x 3/4" opening in a guard to snipe a hand. More realistically, any opening less than about 1 1/2" x 1 1/2" is probably safe from sniping. Zen Warrior's R13, although pretty, is made for being sniped. Likewise, Hanwei's SH1032 has an opening you could drive a truck through. Instead, get yourself one of their SH2206N, or one of Alchem's Swept Hilts. And move your hand every once in a while: it's harder to hit a moving target than a stationary one.

How deep a hole am I digging for myself?

A few posts ago, I talked about the idea of holding a Prize to celebrate my 20th anniversary of fencing in the SCA. Well, I've decided to go ahead with the idea but I've run into a few snags from a direction I didn't expect: my friends.

Their concern is that I will offend the White Scarves by presuming to host a Prize at other than the crown's direction or that my Prize will be taken as a parody of a White Scarf's Prize. These are both valid points, and I must admit that these points never crossed my mind. Now I don't want to offend anyone with this Prize, so I'm glad my friends brought up their concerns.

I really want to do this Prize, but I also don't want to shoot myself in the foot. My first thought was that I should ask the White Scarves of Artemisia for permission to hold the Prize, but I really don't want to do this. Yes, it is their responsibility to ensure that their order is upheld to the proper standards, but I'm a little leery of the precedence I might set if I ask their permission to hold the Prize. My personal belief is that Prizes should not be limited to only those earning their White Scarves, but should be open for other occasions, too.

The compromise I've decided on is to contact them beforehand with my proposal to fight my Prize and ask them if there are any changes to the format that I should make: basically ask what I should have in the Prize, and what I should leave out of it. My hope is that, by including them in the initial planning, I can avoid any unforeseen consequences.

So now I just have to track down all their contact information.

Putting together swords on the cheap

Ever since Artemisia made the move away from epees, the biggest problem for beginning fencers in the SCA has been putting together a sword. For the most part, new fencers tend to be younger than and not as secure financially as their elder counter-parts. They don't have the $250 to spend on a ready-built Alchem, let alone the $300 - $400 to drop on a Darkwood. Which leaves the question of how to put together a sword when you're a starving college student?

You do have a few options. The first is to set your sights a little lower and buy a mass-produced complete sword. Zen Warrior has ready-made rapiers starting at right around $100, and their best (the R9) runs for under $200. The problem here is (to put it in car terms) that Zen Warrior is the Kia of rapiers. They're inexpensive and functional, but they're not exactly high-quality. They have some quality control issues with their blades and the majority of their guards have some serious design flaws. Likewise, Hanwei offers several complete rapiers for under $200. These are probably the Chevrolets of the Rapier world. Better than the Zen Warriors, but still not top of the line. Their guards are more period and much prettier, but you still run into the occasional quality control issue with the blades.

The next option is to buy a used sword from another fencer. This gives you the opportunity to test drive the sword first and, more often than not, you will be getting a better sword than if you were to spend the same amount on a new one. But just like with buying a used car, you need to have it checked out first. Look for soft spots in the blade, excessive bends, cracks, rust and so on. Find out how old the sword is. If a blade is old but still in good shape, then you know the metallurgy on it is good. If you keep it rust-free, odds are it'll outlast you.

Your third option is to make a sword from parts. Buy a blade you like and then either buy, barter for or build the rest yourself. This is how I put together all of my swords. This is probably the most cost effective method of putting together a sword, especially if you can find a deal on a used bare blade. Even if you don't, you can still save a ton of money. For example, my most expensive sword cost a total of $150.35: $75 for the blade (a Solingen), $75 for the guard (a Zen Warrior R9), a home-made horn handle, the pommel weight off of an old foil and a 35-cent copper pipe union. My least expensive? $86: $75 for the blade (a KC), $11 for the pommel and the rest made from scraps (steel bar stock left from a heavy helm for the guard and scrap wood for the handle). Even the Hockey Stick from Heck was made this way. I spent $70 for the bare Alchem blade and then $50 for a wall-hanger that I stole the hardware from.

Yes, building your own sword requires more effort than buying a pre-made sword, but it gives you a sword that is truly yours.

Armor?

I've been hit with some questions lately about what's legal for torso armor, and let me tell you, they run the gamut. Some people are saying Under Armour is legal by itself while others are saying that stretch fencing jackets aren't. Talk about a spread.

So let's tackle Under Armour first. For anyone who doesn't know, Under Armour is a brand of athletic apparel designed to help regulate your body temperature by wicking sweat away from your body. It's great stuff and has been a part of my kit for better than 5 years now, but I never thought of it as armor. But the people who claim it counts as all that's required for torso protection cite the fact that it passes the Society's drop test. Which, while it is a nice piece of trivia, is completely irrelevant. You see, under the definition of abrasion-resistant materials, it specifically lists lycra/spandex mix materials and, well, I hate to break the news to proponents of Under Armour, it is a lycra/spandex mix. So, until the Society's Rapier Handbook is updated to say otherwise, Under Armour is not legal torso protection by itself.

Which leads us to whether stretch fencing jackets are legal or not? The argument against these jackets is that the backs are a stretch nylon that does not meet the Newton requirements set forward in the Society Rapier Handbook. The thing is, just like with the Under Armour, it doesn't matter. The rules state that commercial fencing clothing rated at 550 Newtons is puncture resistant. So whether or not a jacket has stretch panels or not, if the maker rates the jacket at 550 Newtons, it is legal. Of course, the hard part there is finding a stretch jacket that is rated at 550 Newtons. FIE stretch jackets are rated for 800N, but most of the club stretch jackets are only rated for 350N. But if you're willing to put out the extra money for an FIE jacket, you can wear it.

So, for you marshals out there who have fencers trying to buffalo their way through either allowing Under Armour or saying no to stretch jackets, just remember pages 6 and 7 of the S.C.A. Rapier Marshal's Handbook holds all of the answers. And with the jackets, unless the jacket itself says otherwise, assume it meets the standard, but recommend they upgrade to period armor.

XX

It was twenty years ago this summer that I started fencing in the Society. I'd been introduced to the SCA two years ago and played to the very limited extent that my meager funds would allow. I think I'd been to maybe 3 or 4 events and I was pretty much hooked. But I wanted to fight.

There were a couple of problems, though. The first was that I was an under-employed college student and the second was that the SCA in Helena at the time consisted of two people: me and Christian la Sable, another under-employed college student. Christian had been in armor a few times, but didn't have a set of his own. But he did have a set of fencing gear. But that still left us one set of equipment short of what it takes to learn to fence.

And then one day, I was in my favorite second-hand store when I found a well-used mask and foil for $15. I spent most of my spare funds and we were off. Since Christian had taken a few years of college fencing, he was the instructor and I, the student. I learned foil, epee and saber that year.

Then, both Christian and I moved down to Eir Dun, where we found a ready supply of eager fencing students. So we trained, and we learned and within a year we held our first tourney. I don't remember who won, but the damage was done: fencing had been unleashed on Northern Artemisia. Whenever there was two or more Eir Dunis at an event, there was fencing (whether they wanted it or not).

We were even entering into the big leagues, making the transition from foils to epees as our main weapons. And we started to notice fencers popping up in other groups, too. The one group that sticks in my mind as being an early adopter of fencing in Northern Artemisia was Stan Wyrm.

And then, a group of us made a pilgrimage to Loch Salaan for an event and we discovered Albert Sanford and the Schlager. We were, for the first time, authorized fencers. This was the start of the golden age of fencing in Northern Artemisia.

It seemed like every group started sprouting fencers. It wasn't uncommon for a group to have a half-dozen fencers and event stewards began planning tournaments for us, rather than us having to steal time from the stewards. The Fencers of Northern Artemisia was a force to be reckoned with. The culmination of this golden age was Albion's becoming the premier Gold Scarf of the Kingdom of Artemisia.

Times were good.

But then mundanity stepped in. Over a period of 6 months, three of the driving forces in northern fencing (Albion, Antoine and I) were forced to withdraw for various reasons. And our departures were followed by several other fencers we'd pegged as having "it". When I at last returned, there was but one fencer I recognized who was still playing, and he'd been one that I hadn't held much hope for.

Oh, how times had changed. Fencing in Northern Artemisia was back where it had been a decade before, struggling to find itself once again in the Kingdom of Artemisia. But at least there was some continuity. That one fencer. A man for whom my first memory is of throwing him out of a tournament for bringing an open beer to armor inspection. A man who'd had, shall we say, calibration problems when last I'd encountered him. A man who, in the intervening 4 years had overcome his earlier limitations, and become a beacon of hope for fencing in Northern Artemisia. If Albion had been fencing in Northern Artemisia for its Golden Age, Cormac had readily filled that role during his absence.

And then something happened. Just as Albion, Antoine and I all left within 6 months of each other, we all returned within 6 months of each other. I wish I could say that they'd returned because of me, but even in my most egotistical moments, I can't. It was just fate that brought about this happenstance.

But our return didn't bring about an instant return to the Golden Age. In fact, if there's one theme for the past five years, it is one of rebuilding. When I returned in 2006, there was a sense in the kingdom that Northern Artemisians were a bit of an oddity. They were there, but no one was really sure why.

For the most part, we were only seen by our Southern brethren at our yearly pilgrimage to Uprising, and then only as more troops to fill the line or another kill in the next tourney. We didn't stand out, either as a group or individually. Yes, there was Cormac, but he was the exception that proved the rule.

But over the past five years, we have begun to see that change. More and more of the Northern fencers are being recognized. There's Duran and his beautiful cast aluminum mask, Alric and his not-so-beautiful buckler, and so many others. And yes, there's Antoine, Albion and I, each making our presence known in our own way.

And, in fact, it was Antoine and Albion who suggested that I should celebrate my 20th year of fencing by fighting a prize. And the more I think about it, the more I like the idea. Who says Prizes should just be for awards? Why can't they be for celebrations?

Looking for some help

I’ve hit a problem that’s outside of any of my areas of expertise. My wife has decided she wants some new garb. The newest garb she has is probably a good 10 years old and she usually winds up borrowing one of my tunics and “Bob”ing it when she goes to events. But now she wants something new that will fit with my garb.

So last night we took some time and looked at a few options. I started out by showing her what I thought she’d look good in, a nice, 16th century German Gown, and she promptly replied that it was way too fancy for her (no matter how good I think she’d look in it) and began setting down some ground rules. First, no skirts that drag on the ground. Second, no super-long sleves. Third, she doesn’t want to buy it from a catalog, she wants to find someone “local” to make it for her (while she can sew, she won’t sew. Something about spending almost 10 years doing alterations at a dry-cleaners).

You see, the thing is, she doesn’t like dresses. I don’t mean she prefers pants, I mean she doesn’t like dresses. As in, I can count on one hand the number of times she’s worn a dress since we’ve been married and not drop my cup of coffee.

So I figured I’d show her a Persian outfit. And while she didn’t say no to it, she didn’t say yes, either.

Which leads me to my problems: trying to find a style of garb she likes, and finding someone willing to make it for her. Do any of you have any garb ideas beyond her wearing men’s styles? And do any of you know any Northern Artemisian seamsters/seamstresses looking to make a little extra money?

What to bring?

My knight's really good at hitting me with questions that make me think. And his latest one was a doozey. He asked me what I could bring to the White Scarves that would make it worth elevating me. Now he didn't mean how will I bribe them to give me a scarf, he meant: how will my becoming a white scarf add to the white scarves as a whole?

As I've mentioned before, earning your White Scarf takes more than just being good at fencing. Earning you White Scarf means setting yourself up as a role model for other fencers. It means constantly demonstrating those traits expected of the kingdom's finest both on the field and off: honor, courtesy, grace, style, service, and skills both martial and artistic. But that's not all. Everyone who aspires to become a defender of the White Scarf needs something that defines him or her. Something that makes them stand out from the other Defenders. With Don Niccolo, it is his dancing. With Don Albion, it is his music. You can even see among several of the up-and-comers their chosen trademarks. Cormac has his furs while Antoine has his service.

Which still leaves the question of what my trademark is, or will be. One thing that I've had a hard time wrapping my head around is the fact that this very much a "what has he done lately" situation. That, I think, is part of why it took almost 4 years for Albion to earn his White Scarf after his return. And it's part of what's slowed me down, too. If we were looking at historical accomplishments, I could make an argument for having given the White Scarves fencing in Northern Artemisia. But that was better than 15 years ago. What have I done lately?

More importantly, what have I done lately that I want to get credit for? Or what do I want to do?

My knight suggested I start singing, but I said no. It isn't a question of whether I can sing or not. Rather, it's the fact that Albion's trademark is singing. And the problem with that isn't that I might be compared to Albion, or take away from him (Lord knows he's been trying to get me to perform for years). The problem is that I don't want to limit other northern fencer's options for their White Scarf. If I somehow manage to get my White Scarf next, I'm afraid that the other fencers will look at the pair of us and think that the only way to get their scarf is through music. And, as wonderful a person as Albion is, I don't want to see a bunch of little Albion clones running around Northern Artemisia.

I want the fencers in Northern Artemisia to know that they can get their White Scarves by being themselves.

And I shot down service and furs for much the same reason. I have no desire to steal the spotlight from anyone on their quest for their White Scarf. Which still leaves the question of what's my trademark?

Currently, it looks like I have two possible routes, and one of those is accidental. One is through my creation of the Guild of Winter's Pass. My hope is that this will again allow me to say that I bring Northern Artemisia to the White Scarves. The other one - the accidental one - is the introduction of the curved sword to Artemisia. Okay, it wasn't an accident that I bought a curved sword, but my central position in it's spreading has come of a bit of a surprise to me. And okay, it hasn't exactly spread like wildfire, but it is spreading. In addition to the two shorter curved swords that were bought shortly after I got mine, I have orders for two more blades exactly like mine, both from experienced fighters.

But only time will tell what, if anything, will be my gift to the White Scarves of Artemisia.

Vulgar or Sport Fencing?

If you really want to get on the bad side of a fencer in the SCA, call them a sport fencer. A sport fencer is someone who uses any move they can to get the win, no matter if the move was used in period or not. The problem I see with the term sport fencing is that at least in Artemisia, there isn't a lot of sport fencing. At least in the sense of moves that can't be documented as period. Well, okay, there's one area where sport fencing is prevalent - the use of Olympic or Classical footwork - but other than that, most of the fencing is period.

Okay, so maybe a lot of fencers are using a mixture of styles and moves from a half-dozen sources (I know I got a lot of weird looks at the last event when I seamlessly segued from Spanish rapier to Polish sabre to Portuguese great-sword), but this wasn't unheard of in period times. There was even a term for it: the Vulgar style. And if a fencer has a persona that would have traveled a lot, such mixing of styles is perfectly acceptable. I think the problem comes from fencers not being able to say where a particular move comes from or what it's called. I know I was always told that if you can document something, there's not a lot other people can do if they don't like it. So if someone does use the Vulgar style, they can shoot down a lot of arguments that they're "sport fencing" by demonstrating their knowledge of the history of their own moves.

I will warn you, though, that it is a lot more work to document the various aspects of your Vulgar style than it is to try and learn a single master's style. After all, if you're studying Agrippa, then it's easy to remember who came up with the move (or who wrote down the move, rather) and what manual it's from, whereas trying to remember a single source from a half-dozen different sources can be a bit harder. For example, you have to remember if it was Agrippa or Capo Ferro that came up with the Cavere? Or what's the move called where you strike your opponent's blade while stepping into it? [Bonus points for anyone who can answer these]

Personally, I think that learning the Vulgar style is better than learning a style your persona wouldn't have known. After all, a 14th century Scotsman wouldn't have access to DiGrassi and it's a stretch for a Japanese persona from any time period to learn any of the European forms. Another advantage to the Vulgar style is that is allows you to test the waters with several different styles before you find the perfect style for you.

Of course that leads back to the problem of being seen as a sport fencer. Which, in turn, leads back to the idea that there's no such thing as the perfect fencing style.

Winter's Pass

You know, this is one of those days where I wish I didn't feel a good event for a few days afterwards. But, on the plus side, Harvest Court this last weekend was a good event. And in spite of the fact that there wasn't any fencing on the schedule, it didn't stop a half-dozen of us from suiting up for some pick-up fun. And it gave me an opportunity to do some recruiting. About a year ago, I wrote the post Life, the Universe and Everything. In it, I wrote about the need for a fencing guild to help promote fencing in Artemisia. Well, after about a year of hemming and hawing, I finally decided that I should get the ball rolling. So this past weekend, I recruited the first members into Winter's Pass, a guild for fencers in Northern Artemisia.

Notice how I said a guild, not the guild. Trying to start an official, definitive guild for fencers is way more work than I want to try and do right now.

And, of course, I got some questions about the guild, which is good. I don't think that people should just jump into something blindly. One question was why just Northern Artemisia? Part of that is the sheer size of Artemisia. It would be impossible for me to effectively run a guild that spans the entire kingdom. But that is only part of the reason. Southern Artemisia has enough White Scarves that it is easy for fencers there to learn what to do and what not to do to achieve their goals, whether they seek the White Scarf or a Laurel or just camaraderie. Northern Artemisia does not have this abundance.

Another question was why am I using a point system (x points for taking part in tournaments or melees) for the rankings in the guild? And again, this was chosen for a couple of reasons. The first is to avoid the appearance of favoritism in the ranking system. The second reason is to promote travel for the members. If a member wants to be promoted quickly, they need to go to more events, and since they are given extra points for going to events on the royal progress, it encourages them to go to events where they will be noticed.

But to me, the most surprising question was why a scarf instead of a tabard? I can understand the appeal of a tabard: it shows a person is part of something bigger than just themselves. But the way I see it is that tabards are a way of promoting the group while hiding the individual. In some instances, this is what you want. The Brotherhood comes to mind. There's nothing more intimidating than facing a line of fighters all dressed the same way on the battlefield. But the Brotherhood also has something we don't: shields. It's easy for an armored fighter to identify themselves by painting their device on their shield. Fencers, for the most part, don't go into battle with their device displayed prominently on their buckler. So they are usually recognized by their garb. And since my goal is to promote the fencers of Northern Artemisia, covering up their garb would be counter-productive. I want the members of Winter's Pass to be seen as themselves first, and only secondarily as guild members, rather than as "that Winter's Pass guy... what's his name?"

Which, of course, leads to the question nobody thought to ask: if I want people recognized for themselves, why do a guild at all? I'm trying to set up a support structure for fencers in Northern Artemisia to help them avoid the mistakes I've made over the years.

Fencing Laurel?

I was asked about how fencing fits as a "Laurel-able" skill set by a good lady in the West with far more awards than I will ever have. This is one of those wonderfully annoying questions that really makes you think. My first thought was that it doesn't really matter how I think fencing fits into the purview of the Order of the Laurel, what matters is how Laurel's think it does. But it didn't take much consideration to realize that if I can't explain how fencing fits into the Arts and Sciences, then I can't expect a Laurel to take it that way.

She pointed out that the Laurel is for the arts, which are creative, while fencing is martial and therefore destructive. My counter to this is that the making of siege weapons and swords are also martial in nature and yet they fall under the purview of the Laurel.

She was nice enough to offer me the out of comparing fencing to dance, which is valid. Both fencing and dance are, at their essence, the combination of movements to create something. Although she did question whether fencing can make the leap from something that is simply done properly to something that contains the beauty which is expected from art. That last part is actually misleading. After all, as the old saying goes, "beauty is in the eye of the beholder." Personally, I don't find Byzantine mosaics particularly attractive, but I can see the skill and the craftsmanship necessary to create such works of art. Likewise, a well done pass is the style of Thibault may not appeal to everyone, the correctness of the movements will be obvious. I think anyone who has ever watched a pass between two experienced fencers can attest to the dance-like quality that such a fight can take.

But, like dance, that's assuming that the fencer in question uses period techniques. Which is where my own style hits a snag or two. I don't fight in the style of Thibault, or DiGrassi or Agrippa or any single master. But I have studied Thibault, DiGrassi, Agrippa, Talhoffer, and Silver among others whose names either escape me or were never known. And I have mixed and matched from them to come up with what works for me. In period, this was called the Vulgar style, but it does lead to the problem that it makes it more difficult for those watching to say yes, that's period.

I think the biggest argument for the validity of a Laurel in fencing is that it was considered an art form in period times. The Hanko Döbringer fechtbuch from 1389 begins, "Here begins Master Liechtenauer’s art of fencing with the sword, on foot and on horseback, in armour and without." Likewise, there is Fillipo Vadi's Book on the Art of Fighting With Swords from 1487 and of course DiGrassi's True Arte of Defense.

So while it is easy to argue for fencing to fall under the purview of the Laurel, it still leaves the question of whether I have what it takes to become a Laurel on this road.

Blade Length

I think I raised a few eyebrows over on Artemisia Militaris by asking about the minimum length for rapiers in Artemisia. After clarifying that I was looking for the shortest blade I could use, not the longest, I got my answer, along with the comment that Thibault recommends a sword's quillons be at the level of your navel. Now, I'm not exactly a short person. Going by Thibault, that would mean about a 42" blade. That's a long sword.

The thing is, I'm not a big fan of long blades. They tend to be slower and whippier than their shorter cousins. I prefer blades more along the lines of Silver's perfect length. His view was:

To know the perfect length of your sword, you shall stand with your sword and dagger drawn, as you see this picture, keeping out straight your dagger arm, drawing back your sword as far as conveniently you can, not opening the elbow joint of your sword arm, and look what you can draw within your dagger, that is the just length of your sword, to be made according to your own stature.

Going by this, the perfect length for my sword should be about 38". Which, considering all of my current swords are between 36" and 40", puts me right in the ballpark for what Silver considered proper.

But that doesn't answer the question of why I want a sword shorter than period masters recommended. While existing examples of period rapiers can blades from 32" to 50" in length, we have to remember that even if we call ourselves rapier fighters, rapiers weren't the only swords in use at the time. This past winter, I talked about Grosses Messers, Kreigmessers, and Swiss Sabers in The History of The Hockey Stick from Heck, but those aren't the only examples. There was the Dussack, which sported a blade between 25" and 38" or the Cutlass with a blade that averaged about 24" and Henry VIII had a hunting sword with a blade just under 26". Now while hunting swords were never intendend for combat, it wasn't uncommon to find either the Dussack or the Cutlass being used on the battlefield.

You see, that's the thing. My persona wasn't built around the idea of being a courtier, my persona is that of a soldier. Mounted infantry, to be precise. What, in 30 years, would be commonly known as a Dragoon, in fact. And I'm trying to style my blades around what my persona would have carried. I have my Swiss Saber, which my persona would have used from horseback, but my persona would have also carried a shorter Dussack or Cutlass for when the fighting got hot and heavy on foot.

That, and there's a little thing about a challenge I received at my first event after getting out of the Army. We were sitting around the encampment, talking about what our goals were in the SCA. So I mentioned that I wanted to be a T.A.N.K. (for those of you from out of kingdom, that stands for Totally Agressive, Nasty Killer). While this award has only been given to armored fighters so far, there's nothing in the requirements that say you have to be an armored fighter to get it. One of the guys I was talking to was a T.A.N.K., and he looked me up and down and said that if I went out with a 28" blade and buckler and started mopping the floor with everyone, he'd see what he could do about it.

Will I mop the floor with everyone? I don't know, but it's sure worth a try.

Right of way

There has been some discussion on Artemisia Millitaris about the idea of right of way and whether or not it plays a role in rapier fighting. Right of way is a common principle in modern fencing that says that if two people attack at about the same time, whoever started their attack first is given the touch unless their blade has been parried sufficiently to bring their point off-target. Fighting in the SCA does not use this principle. If two combatants throw their attacks at about the same time and both attacks land, both hits are good. Sometimes this means trading an arm for a kill and sometimes it means both fighters are dead.

Now while right of way isn't a rule in the SCA, the question remains of whether practicing right of way is a good idea? Short answer: yes. Long answer: usually. The way I see it, the goal of tournament fighting is to not lose. Okay, so how do you not lose? Don't get killed. Which means when they attack, you should parry. Then you can kill them. It ties straight back into those old drills: attack, parry, repost, parry, repost... and so on and so on. Yes, there are times when there's nothing more effective than a stop-thrust, but the stop-thrust should be just one part of your bag of tricks, not your main move.

Unfortunately, for many of us, our instinctual reaction to our opponent starting to move is to attack. Which leads to double-kills and train wrecks. How often have you heard someone say, "I was throwing my shot when you landed" to explain away a hard hit?

Another common problem is people trying to parry and attack at the same time. The problem with this is that it is very difficult to do both well at the same time. Think about it: when you parry, you are primarily moving your blade either left, right, up or down and when you are attacking, you are primarily moving your blade forward. Which means that when you parry, you are changing the distance, angle of attack and point of impact for you opponent. And if you're attacking while parrying, all those things are changing while you're throwing your shot. It's far easier to wait until your parry is finished and those variables have stopped changing before you throw your shot.

So do I think right of way should be part of the SCA's combat rules? No. After all, if two people were to attack at the same time in a real sword fight, odds are that they'd both be dead. Do I think we should practice right of way? Yes. Because it's hard to not lose if the other guy keeps stabbing you when you stab them.

Giving your all

My knight yelled at me at this last fighter's practice. I was fighting this one gentleman I hadn't fought in years. And while he's a nice enough fellow, he comes across as a bit arrogant and I was having fun tearing him to pieces. Afterwards, my knight came up and asked me what I was doing. I think I said something about winning. You'd think my knight would have been happy, right? Wrong.

Oh, he wasn't upset that I was winning. He was upset because I was letting my opponent control the fight. I'd been reacting to my opponent, rather than forcing him to react to me. And what was worse was that I was using the same style as my opponent. I did manage - in my own defense - to come up with two passes where I'd taken control. Two passes in a half hour of fighting.

According to my knight, I was resting on my Laurels. Especially when he compared it to my sparring against one of the more experienced fencers present. While I didn't have quite the kill ratio in that set of passes, I spent the time maneuvering my opponent to where I wanted him to be: forcing openings, baiting attacks, and just being a pain in the posterior in general.

Looking back, I can see what my knight was getting at. I'm lazy. So I tend to put forward the bare minimum to achieve my goals. What I need to start working on is giving everyone the same fight, from the newest fighter to the best. If I can do that, well it might suck for the new fencer, but it might just give me that extra edge against to more experienced ones.